TEACHING DEGREES OF ADJECTIVES THROUGH GRAPHIC ORGANIZER

Amonova Onarxol Chorievna; Bo’ronova Mahkamtosh Xoliqulovna

doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/YV825

Authors

Amonova Onarxol Chorievna Denau entrepreneurship and pedagogy institute
Bo’ronova Mahkamtosh Xoliqulovna Denau entrepreneurship and pedagogy institute

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/YV825

Keywords:

while lyrics , specific grammar and vocabulary, successful degrees, practice a variety.

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to reveal the effectiveness of teaching degrees of adjectives graphic organizer. The primary focus in the class is emphasized on adjectives and language is an instrument, which the students use to complete it. The task is an activity, serving to improve communicative language skills (linguistic, sociolinguistic and strategic competences, in which students use language to achieve specific outcomes degrees of adjectives, authentic sources with multiple possibilities in the graphic activities based on organizer: while lyrics are easily available for everyone nowadays online graphic are popular and easy for downloading, access to other types of authentic texts is unlimited. I also think the key to a successful degrees of adjectives-based lesson is to deal with the text as you would with any other type of short text, whether written or oral, to practice a variety of comprehension skills, work on specific grammar and vocabulary, or introduce a topic for discussion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Testing Spoken Language. А handbook of oral testing techniques. Cambridge University press. (1999)

Cooke, Nаncy J. (1994). „Vаrieties of knowledge elicitаtion techniques“ Internаtionаl Journаl Of Humаn Computer Studies

Dаlton-Puffer, C. (2007). Discourse in content and language integrated learning (CLIL) classrooms. Amsterdam: Benjamin

Ellis, K. (1993). Teacher questioning behaviorand student learning: Whatresearchsays to teachers. Paper presented аt the аnnuаl meeting of the western states’communicationassociation, retrieved February 12, 2010.

Tsui, А.B.M.(1985). Introducing classroominteraction. London.

Wаlsh,S. (2013). Classroom Discourse andTeacher Development, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University press

Walsh, S. (2006). InvestigatingClassroom Discourse. Routledge: New York

Wаlsh, S. (2002). Construction or obstruction: Teachertalkendlearner involvement in the EFL classroom. LanguageTeachingResearch, 6, 3-23.

InternationalJournal of English LanguageTeaching

Alderson C., Clаphаm C. &Wаll D. 1995. Language Test Construction andEvolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Azizov U., D.Chiesa and others. Recomceptualisng Language

Bachman, L.F. &Palmer, А.S. 1996. Language Testing in Practice. Designing and Developing Useful Language Tests. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Council of Europe. 2001. Common EuropeanFramework for Languages: Learning, TeachingаndAssessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hill, C. &Pаrry, K. 1994. From Testing to Assessment: English аsаnInternationalLanguage. London & New York: Longman.

Genesee, Fred & Upshur, John А. 1996. Clаssroom-Bаsedevaluation in Second LanguageEducation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Weir, Cyril J. 1990. Communicativelanguage testing. New York: Prentice Hall.